The social form known as “Tribe” has been the subject of many studies in the contemporary field of social sciences; examples of these works include Émile Durkheim (1893), Pierre Clastres (1974) and Edward Evans-Pritchard (1968). This category has been judged irrelevant by many specialists of African societies due to the colonial semantic weight (Amselle et M’Bokolo, 2005). However this notion of Tribe is witnessing a new kind of interest in the Middle Eastern context and in the broader context of the Islamic World (J. Friedman, 1975 ; P. Bonte et E. Conte, 1991 ; P.S. Khoury et J. Kostiner, 1991 ; H. Dawod, 2004 ; R. Tapper, ; P. Dresch, etc.). Underlined by a frantic public debate, which tries to make sense of the Libyan, Afghan, Iraqi and Syrian conflicts, the “tribal question” does not seem to fade away. Moreover the multiplication of questionings concerning the relationship between State and Tribes nourishes the renewed interest for this social formation.

Although this roundtable will definitely deal with contemporary problematics, it will avoid answering the specific questions dealt with in the public debate, namely “whether Middle-East societies will undergo a process of re-tribalisation or of de-tribalisation?”. This academic group will intend to envisage the “Tribe” as a multifaceted phenomenon from the viewpoint of its political and social efficiency in the long run. The proposed study will take the form of a series of linked investigations highlighting analogous issues, concerning diverse populations in different periods.

Putting the historical question at the core of our approach certainly allows us to consider the firm grounding of these social and political ascriptions and self-attributions of identity within the Middle East societies. It also helps reaffirm the necessity of anthropological studies aimed at understanding past periods. And lastly it gives scholars the opportunity to stay away from any evolutionist vision putting the advent of political and economic “modernity” at the core of any social transformation taking place during the 20^th and the 21^st centuries. Thus the notion of neo-tribalism put forward by Jonathan Friedmann (2004) will be questioned. This group will deal with the writing of the history of well-known contemporary tribes while reconstructing historical narratives used by tribal actors and dealing with tribal phenomena evoked by Arab, Turkish, Persian and other historiographies. The different case studies will present the meaning of what the ‘Tribe’ implies for social, political and economic organization of Middle Eastern societies.

Several thematic paths will be considered:

Construct or deconstruct the “Tribe”: what are the tools to understand the phenomenon? Many debates on the question of ‘Tribes’ focus on its ontology. While some scholars acknowledge the intractable presence of family logics within the structuration of political fields in the Middle East, others find many reasons to exclude this variable from their analyses. Are there new and useful tools available in order to overcome this sterile debate?
Segmentarity and power within the tribe: What about the status of the tribal chieftain? What about the assumed relativity of power and segments (clans and sub-clans) within the tribe submitted (or not) to the logics of segmentary fusion and fission?
Aristocracies, casts or tribes? Does the tribal structures belong to the whole society or does it only apply to specific (acting and armed) segments of the society?
Tribes and bedouinness: Is the social and economic Bedouin organization (subsistence economy) at the core or the origin of the said tribal societies? What is the link between way of life, distribution of economic tasks and belonging to the tribe? Apparently rhetorical for political science specialists, this question is not unimportant for historians and anthropologists although concerned by the need to avoid any essentialist or determinist approach.
Tribes and States: The Tribe can be perceived as the (political, security or fiscal) interface for State power or as an organization structured in opposition to it. It will be necessary to consider the articulation beyond the narrative depicting the tribes dissolving themselves in the State structure. From this point of view the historical approach is enlightening.
The sectarian variable: Does belonging to a sect produce cleavages and assert the separation between tribes or within the tribes? This approach allows for us to expose the complexity of identities and highlight the role of tribal solidarity networks within general social dynamics among which the sectarian logics can be found.
Loci and situations where the tribe manifests itself (diwanxana/madafa, ta‘ziyye, majalis, diwaniyya, intertribal conflicts, elections etc.): Discourses of tribal belonging do not seem to be deployed or to be efficient in all the contexts. The study group will undertake the task of listing these loci and contexts while taking into account the presence of competing narratives and analyzing their articulation in these ‘tribally dominated’ contexts.

Program

9:00-9:15 Introduction

9:15-10:00 Edouard Conte (CNRS-LAS)

“Intisâb. Elective Affinities and the Construction of Pedigree in North Jordan”

10:00-10:45 Norig Neveu (Ifpo-Amman)

“‘We are all brothers’, questioning tribal and sectarian solidarities in the region of Karak (South Jordan) in the 20th century”.

10 :45-11 :00 Coffee Break

11:00-11:45 Claire Beaugrand (Ifpo-Territoire Palestinien)

“The construction of hadhar/badu/bidun categories in Kuwait”

11:45-12h30 Victoria Fontan (American University of Dohuk)

“The relevance of tribes and tribal systems in social cohesion against ISIS”

12:30-14:00 Lunch Break

14:00-14:45 Boris James (Ifpo-Erbil)

“In, out or against the Empire: the cursed destiny of medieval Kurdish Tribes”

14:45-15:30 Djene Bajalan (American University of Iraq, Sulaimani)

“Tribe and Nation in the Ottoman Kurdistan (1880-1914)”

15:30-15:45 Coffee Break

15:45-16:30 Edith Szanto (American University of Iraq, Sulaimani)

“From Faith to Family: Religion and Tribes in Modern Kurdistan.”

16:30-17:15 Sara Zandi Karimi Bajalan (American University of Iraq, Sulaimani)

Kurdish tribes and the state in Iran during the interwar period

17:15-17:30 Conclusion

Each contribution will last 30 minutes.

Indicative Bibliography

Amselle, Jean-Loup et M’Bokolo, Elikia, Au cœur de l’ethnie. Ethnies, tribalisme et État en Afrique, Paris, La Découverte/Maspero, 1985.

Bonte, Pierre et Conte, Édouard, Al-Ansab. La quête des origines. Anthropologie historique de la société tribale arabe, Paris, Édition des sciences de l’homme, 1991.

Clastres, Pierre, La société contre l’État, Paris, Les Éditions de Minuit, 1974.

Dawod, Hosham (dir.), Tribus et pouvoir en terre d’Islam, Paris, Armand Colin, 2004.

Dresch, Paul, Tribes, Government and History in Yemen, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1989.

Durkheim, Émile, De la division sociale du travail (1893), Paris, PUF, 1973.

Evans-Pritchard, Edward, The Nuer, trad. Les Nuer, Paris, Gallimard, 1968.

Friedman, Jonathan, “Tribes, States, and Transformations”, in Maurice Bloch, Marxist Analyses and Social Anthropology, Londres et New York, Routledge, 1975.

Friedman, Jonathan, “Choc de cultures et logique du déclin hégémonique”, in Hosham Dawod (dir.), Tribus et pouvoirs en terre d’Islam. Paris. A. Colin 2004, 261-279

Khoury, Philip S. et Kostiner, Joseph, Tribes and State Formation in the Middle East, Berkeley, Los Angeles; Oxford, University of California Press, 1991.

Tapper, Richard (Dir.), The Conflict of Tribe and State in Iran and Afghanistan. London & Canberra, Croom Helm, 1983.

To join the Facebook event : https://www.facebook.com/events/1532828423675574/

Ifpo Kurdes UNE ETHNOGRAPHIE SUCCINCTE DE « L'ENTRE-DEUX... par Boris James Etudes rurales, EHESS, 2010, Ruralité,... Lire la suite	CEDEJ appel à contributions APPEL À CONTRIBUTION « MONDE ARABE ET DIPLOMATIES... Ébranlé par les soulèvements populaires de 2011, le monde... Lire la suite	CEDEJ frontière Penser les frontières au Moyen-Orient et au Sahel :... Thinking about the borders in the Middle East and the Sahel... Lire la suite
Ifpo violences Violence et militantisme. Parcours d’engagements au... SS DIR. DE ERMINIA CHIARA CALABRESE ET VALENTINA NAPOLITANO... Lire la suite	Ifpo villes Penser et panser la néo-libéralisation ? Penser et panser la néo-libéralisation ? : Etudier les... Lire la suite	Ifpo Etat Nation L’État au péril des sociétés au Moyen-Orient L’État au péril des sociétés au Moyen-Orient Par Myriam... Lire la suite
CEDEJ monde arabe 2ème Congrès du GIS Moyen Orient et Mondes musulmans Pour favoriser les échanges entre chercheurs et améliorer... Lire la suite	Ifpo patrimoine Patrimoines contestés, réceptions locales, discours,... Dans le cadre d’une réflexion pluridisciplinaire croisant... Lire la suite	IFEA - Istanbul Diyarbakır Diyarbakır : aperçu de l’après-guerre Par Martine Assénat Sur, la cité intra-muros de Diyarbakır... Lire la suite

UMIFRE

Unités mixtes des instituts français de recherche à l'étranger

The Middle East and its Tribes: A useful resource or a troubling legacy?

Date de début:

Date de fin:

Type d'événement:

Publié ici :

Mis à jour le :

Mots-clefs:

Zone géographique:

Visiter le site web

Program

Indicative Bibliography

Derniers contenus par mots-clefs

Formulaire de recherche

The Middle East and its Tribes: A useful resource or a troubling legacy?

Date de début:

Date de fin:

Type d'événement:

Publié ici :

Mis à jour le :

Mots-clefs:

Zone géographique:

Visiter le site web

Program

Indicative Bibliography

Derniers contenus par mots-clefs

Twitter

Facebook